On Wednesday 20 Aug 2003 22:58 in <3F43EEEB.5010304@fireserve.net>, Dennis
Gearon (gearond@fireserve.net) wrote:
> I prefer NOT to have to scroll down to the bottom of an email anyway. I
> think discussion list emails like ours need to be like your medical
> records, the most important, recent stuff is at the top.
This approach puts answers out of the context of their related questions.
Virtually all Usenet newsgroups and private mailing lists are Q&A style
technical support forums. They are not at all like medical records, which
are mostly logs of empirical data. Consequently, the "medical records"
analogy is really a poor one for a context like the one in which this
meta-discussion is occurring.
Instead, the person replying to a message should trim that message down to
the specific parts to which the follow-up will pertain, and then place each
answer immediately after the question or observation to which it is
replying.
This has been the Usenet convention for over 15 years [and a Fidonet
convention even before that].
> I'm not exactly sure what full quoting is.
Full-quoting is the retention of those parts of a message to which the
follow-up message is not replying. See my follow-up to David Olbersen's
message for an explanation of why this is poor practice.
--
Regards,
Dave [RLU#314465]
======================================================
dwnoon@spamtrap.ntlworld.com (David W Noon)
Remove spam trap to reply via e-mail.
======================================================
