Re: [GENERAL] Timezone locale consistency for functional indexes - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Timezone locale consistency for functional indexes
Date
Msg-id 7f1221c5-1b63-2063-25f1-d0369d2a9b25@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Timezone locale consistency for functional indexes  (Olav Gjerde <olav@backupbay.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 06/12/2017 06:11 AM, Olav Gjerde wrote:
> I figured out the issue, it was as simple as some developers used the
> default in Java's Hibernate which created the timestamp columns
> without time zone.
>
> Anyway I guess this is the correct approach that also take summer time
> into consideration? And using the immutable function wrapper is wrong?
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Olav Gjerde <olav@backupbay.com> wrote:
>> I have a table that I try create an functional index on like this:
>>
>> CREATE INDEX my_index_name
>> ON opening_hours (
>>      opening_hours_type,
>>      EXTRACT(YEAR FROM date),
>>      EXTRACT(MONTH FROM date)
>> )
>>
>> But I get the following error: functions in index expression must be
>> marked IMMUTABLE
>>
>>
>> But if I change it to:
>>
>> CREATE INDEX my_index_name
>> ON opening_hours (
>>      opening_hours_type,
>>      EXTRACT(YEAR FROM date AT TIME ZONE 'UTC'),
>>      EXTRACT(MONTH FROM date AT TIME ZONE 'UTC')
>> )
>> The index will be created.
>>
>> On other systems it could be the oppsite, that it only works without
>> the additional AT TIME ZONE
>>
>> On all systems, the default Timezone in postgresql.conf is set to UTC
>> and show timezone; return UTC. Additionally show lc_time; returns
>> nb_NO.UTF-8
>>
>> What kind of system settings could cause this behaviour?  We run
>> Ubuntu Linux 16.04 and Postgresql 9.6
>>
>> Another question is, should I just create immutable functions wrappers
>> for this instead?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kind Regards / Med Vennlig Hilsen
>>
>> Olav Grønås Gjerde
>
>
>


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Olav Gjerde
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Timezone locale consistency for functional indexes
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Timezone locale consistency for functional indexes