Parallel queries - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Ansley
Subject Parallel queries
Date
Msg-id 7F124BC48D56D411812500D0B747251480F3B8@FILESERVER002
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
<p><font size="2">All, </font><p><font size="2">How hard would it be to get a back end to hand off parts of a query
treeto other back ends (which it created), and then collate the results, and take it from there?  Obviously, it would
onlydo this under certain conditions, specifically, if it was compiled in to the server, and the query tree in question
hada particular profile, i.e.: lent itself to parallel processing.  But surely it couldn't be that difficult to get a
backend to hand off, say, a sub-select sub-tree, or UNION sub-trees.  Under heavy loads with the right hardware, this
couldgain significant performance improvement.</font><br /><p><font size="2">Michael Ansley</font><code><font
size="3"><br/><br /> **********************************************************************<br /> This email and any
filestransmitted with it are confidential and<br /> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they<br/> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify<br /> Nick West - Global Infrastructure
Manager.<br/><br /> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by<br /> MIMEsweeper for the
presenceof computer viruses.<br /><br /> www.mimesweeper.com<br />
**********************************************************************<br/></font></code> 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kajetan Hofman"
Date:
Subject: Getting Software
Next
From: Mathieu Dube
Date:
Subject: 1024 limit??