Re: Plans for 8.2? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mikael Carneholm
Subject Re: Plans for 8.2?
Date
Msg-id 7F10D26ECFA1FB458B89C5B4B0D72C2B0A0231@sesrv12.wirelesscar.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Plans for 8.2?  ("H.J. Sanders" <hjs@rmax.nl>)
Responses Re: Plans for 8.2?  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Re: Plans for 8.2?  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>)
List pgsql-general
>>
>> Too bad - I think that will keep a lot of potential users from
>> evaluating Pg as a serious alternative. Good or bad, decide for
>> yourself :)

>Why on earth should that be?

Citing Baldur Norddahl (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2006-01/msg00597.php):

"I will also point out that none of the replication solutions have the same solid reputation as postgresql. As long the
postgresqlteam will not endorse a replication solution, you can not expect people to put the same trust in these
solutionsas we put into postgresql itself." 

/Mikael

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: John DeSoi
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Top 10 Wishlist
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Plans for 8.2?