Re: Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Reid Thompson
Subject Re: Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?
Date
Msg-id 7C0800F63CCF4149AC0FC5EE2A04122611FCF5@sr002-2k3exc.ateb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?  (Andrzej Zawadzki <zawadaa@wp.pl>)
List pgsql-performance

This may be of interest...


http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2008/05/ahead_of_the_cu_4.html

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Andrzej Zawadzki
Sent: Fri 5/23/2008 6:41 AM
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: [PERFORM] Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?

Hello,

 We're planning new production server for PostgreSQL and I'm wondering
which processor (or even platform) will be better: Quad Xeon or Quad
Opteron (for example SUN now has a new offer Sun Fire X4440 x64).

When I was buying my last database server, then SUN v40z was a really
very good choice (Intel's base server was slower). This v40z still works
pretty good but I need one more.

AFAIK Intel made some changes in chipset but... is this better then AMD
HyperTransport and Direct Connect Architecture from database point of
view? How about L3 cache - is this important for performance?

Do You have any opinions? Suggestions?

Thanks,

Best regards

--
Andrzej Zawadzki

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Knight, Doug"
Date:
Subject: Re: Quad Xeon or Quad Opteron?
Next
From: Jessica Richard
Date:
Subject: index performance on large tables with update and insert