Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bryn Llewellyn
Subject Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter
Date
Msg-id 7B50CB1F-0F02-4BA5-8E1B-22B3A52BAB8A@yugabyte.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:

bryn@yugabyte.com wrote:

The DO block runs without error and reports "INFO:  42". This is an unambiguous semantic error because "a" is declared "constant"… Is this a known issue?

Thanks for the instant response, Tom. It's uncanny that you spotted this on Saturday 30-Apr and I spotted it just three days later on Tuesday 3-May. One of us must be psychic.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter
Next
From: Steve Baldwin
Date:
Subject: Logical replication 'possible' problem