Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter
Date
Msg-id 2234967.1651616526@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter  (Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com>)
Responses Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
Bryn Llewellyn <bryn@yugabyte.com> writes:
> The DO block runs without error and reports "INFO:  42". This is an unambiguous semantic error because "a" is
declared"constant". 

> Is this a known issue?

It is, see

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=ccd10a9bf

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bryn Llewellyn
Date:
Subject: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter
Next
From: Bryn Llewellyn
Date:
Subject: Re: Meaning of "constant" not honored when the variable is used as the actual for a proc's OUT formal paameter