Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alistair Bayley
Subject Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation
Date
Msg-id 79d7c4980607290523j6f9203ccy4b95c4395ea59d71@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
> Oh, you didn't say you were on Windows

I did, but it was buried in the first paragraph...

> Magnus, did you have a specific reason for choosing Europe/Dublin,
> or was it just alphabetically first?  Europe/London looks at least
> marginally closer to what one would think "GMT" means:

Does it have to be a specific city? I'd rather it just chose GMT.

Alistair

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Flemming Frandsen
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance of the listen command
Next
From: Michael Fuhr
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance of the listen command