Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?
Date
Msg-id 79aea357-dba6-9a67-b1e3-ac729754da68@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical rep depends on?  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?
Re: [HACKERS] tablesync patch broke the assumption that logical repdepends on?
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/16/17 22:01, Noah Misch wrote:
> This PostgreSQL 10 open item is past due for your status update.  Kindly send
> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
> update.  Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170404140717.GA2675809%40tornado.leadboat.com

I think we're not really sure yet what to do about this.  Discussion is
ongoing.  I'll report back on Wednesday.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Self-signed certificate instructions