Re: Extending varlena - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extending varlena
Date
Msg-id 7984.1219101558@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extending varlena  (Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>)
Responses Re: Extending varlena  (Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> writes:
> Anyways (back on topic), I am in favor of removing limits from any 
> section of the database ... not just your suggestion.  The end-user 
> application should impose limits.

That's nice as an abstract principle, but there are only so many hours
in the day, so we need to prioritize which limits we're going to get rid
of.  The 4-byte limit on individual Datum sizes does not strike me as a
limit that's going to be significant for practical use any time soon.
(I grant David's premise that people will soon want to work with objects
that are larger than that --- but not that they'll want to push them
around as indivisible, store-and-fetch-as-a-unit field values.)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Extending varlena
Next
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: Extending varlena