Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 10:34 +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
>> On further reflection I think that initdb time is probably sufficient.
>> Do you think that would be a reasonable TODO ?
> I think you'd have to explain why this was needed. It was useful for
> performance once, but not anymore.
Yeah, some demonstration that choosing another size is actually useful
would be a good idea before we go to the trouble of making it runtime
configurable. It's already build-time configurable, and I'm not
convinced that that's not sufficient.
regards, tom lane
