Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 20:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Just paranoia, I guess. �I can't actually see a reason why we'd have
>> any committable files in the tree matching that pattern. �OTOH, we
>> probably also need the same type of pattern for .sl and .dylib,
>> so at some point a more conservative pattern would be wise.
> Do we know what the exact pattern would be for .sl and .dylib? Are
> they following the same basic pattern of .sl.<major>.<minor>?
Yes, they'll be just the same --- Makefile.shlib treats all those
extensions alike.
regards, tom lane
