Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I don't really see a point in doing this renaming in the first
> place. It's not like the Temp suffix has become inaccurate. I'd perhaps
> not add it in the green field, but I don't see a need to change an
> existing function name. If anything it seems confusing because you'd
> miss something when trivially searching the history / comparing
> branches.
It seems that the vote is 2-1 against renaming that function, so I've
committed Thomas' patch without that and with some additional
comment-smithing.
regards, tom lane
