Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility
Date
Msg-id 7706013aeb104e92594427647857768fe68cd7b8.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 13:55 -0400, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 25, 2024, at 7:33 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> > I took at a stab at this, using some of your text, but discussing API and ABI separately.
>
> Oh man this is fantastic, thank you! I’d be more than happy to just turn this into a patch.
> But where should it go? Upthread I assumed xfunc.sgml, and still think that’s a likely
> candidate. Perhaps I’ll just start there --- unless someone thinks it should go somewhere
> other than the docs.

Perhaps such information should go somewhere here:
https://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_createsubscriber: drop pre-existing subscriptions from the converted node
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: walsender.c comment with no context is hard to understand