On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A customer of ours has the need for temporary functions. The use case
> is writing test cases for their databases: the idea being that their
> code creates a temp function which then goes away automatically at
> session end, just like a temp table. It's said that this makes things
> generally easier for the test harness.
This is one reason why I recommend that pgTAP tests run inside a transaction.
> Other object types that would also be useful to have as temp-able are
> types, domains and casts; and perhaps (if someone sees a need)
> aggregates and operators. Other objects are not necessary, but if
> someone thinks that some more stuff should be made temp-able, we'd try
> to go for as general a solution as possible. But these aren't critical;
> functions are the main pain point.
Running the tests inside a transaction gives you this for free, right now -- *and* leaves the database in a known state
atthe end (modulo sequences).
Can you just use transactions?
Best,
David
PS: What test framework and harness are you using?
