Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 install woes - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Taber, Mark
Subject Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 install woes
Date
Msg-id 7660B79A29B9D411999F00D0B78EC8900B725286@NTRK2
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL 8.0 install woes  ("Taber, Mark" <Mark.Taber@dof.ca.gov>)
List pgsql-general

A final note…we are up and running.  Thanks again for all the help.  So post mortem indicates that 1) Port 5432 was not available, despite what our network guys told me; 2) In my rush to get things up and running, I forgot to make relevant changes to the .conf files (problem lay between the keyboard and the chair).

 

Mark Taber

State of California

Department of Finance

Infrastructure & Architecture Unit

916.323.3104 x2945


From: Taber, Mark
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 1:55 PM
To: Taber, Mark; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.0 install woes

 

Thanks for your help.  Over the protests of my network guys, I did a port scan, and sure enough, port 5432 wasn’t available.  Also, my .conf file was only looking for localhost.  Having worked through this, now there’s something wrong with my pg_hba.conf file. 

 

Again, thanks, all.

 

Mark Taber

State of California

Department of Finance

Infrastructure & Architecture Unit

916.323.3104 x2945


From: Taber, Mark
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 11:29 AM
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL 8.0 install woes

 

I have Postgres 8.0-beta2 set up on two machines (one Windows 2000 Server, the other Windows XP Pro); I have Postgres up and running as a service on both machines, no problem.  I’m even able to go into psql and putz around.  However, I am not able to log on remotely using pgAdmin III.  Whenever I attempt to add a server, I get the following message:

 

An error has occurred:

 

Error connecting to the server: could not connect to the server: Connection refused (0x0000274D/10061)

     Is the server running on host “nnn.nnn.nnn.nnn” and accepting

     TCP/IP connections on port 5432?

 

The answer is, yes the server is running on the host, and there are no restrictions on either machine for port 5432.  It fails in both directions.  The machines can see each other on the network.

 

Thanks in advance for all your help.

 

Mark Taber

State of California

Department of Finance

Infrastructure & Architecture Unit

916.323.3104 x2945

 

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: LOST REFERENTIAL INTEGRITY
Next
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: Cursors and JDBC