Re: ECPG parse.pl and parse2.pl - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: ECPG parse.pl and parse2.pl
Date
Msg-id 7481.1307996447@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to ECPG parse.pl and parse2.pl  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Surely we don't need parse.pl and parse2.pl?  parse.pl, the one that's
> not used, it already showing signs of semi-bit-rot:

> Use of assignment to $[ is deprecated at ./parse.pl line 21.

> I propose that we move parse2.pl to parse.pl and only keep the one.

Yes.  This was objected to immediately when Michael made it that way in
the first place, but he didn't change it.  I don't think we need to use
HEAD as a repository for obsolete code, when we have a perfectly good
SCM.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Creating new remote branch in git?
Next
From: Dan Ports
Date:
Subject: Re: SSI patch renumbered existing 2PC resource managers??