Re: SCSI vs SATA - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From jason@ohloh.net
Subject Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date
Msg-id 74022AFF-0CB6-421C-B2D7-2A88A93C9604@ohloh.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SCSI vs SATA  (Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>)
Responses Re: SCSI vs SATA  (Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Apr 4, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:

> If you don't care about such things, it may actually be possible to
> build a similar set-up as your SATA-system with 12 or 16 15k rpm
> SAS disks or 10k WD Raptor disks. For the sata-solution you can
> also consider a 24-port Areca card.

fwiw, I've had horrible experiences with areca drivers on linux. I've
found them to be unreliable when used with dual AMD64 processors  4+
GB of ram. I've tried kernels 2.16 up to 2.19... intermittent yet
inevitable ext3 corruptions. 3ware cards, on the other hand, have
been rock solid.

-jay



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Arjen van der Meijden
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Next
From: Arjen van der Meijden
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA