Re: SCSI vs SATA - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Arjen van der Meijden
Subject Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date
Msg-id 4613FEB4.9040303@tweakers.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SCSI vs SATA  ("jason@ohloh.net" <jason@ohloh.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On 4-4-2007 21:17 jason@ohloh.net wrote:
> fwiw, I've had horrible experiences with areca drivers on linux. I've
> found them to be unreliable when used with dual AMD64 processors  4+ GB
> of ram. I've tried kernels 2.16 up to 2.19... intermittent yet
> inevitable ext3 corruptions. 3ware cards, on the other hand, have been
> rock solid.

That's the first time I hear such a thing. We have two systems (both are
previous generation 64bit Xeon systems with 6 and 8GB memory) which run
perfectly stable with uptimes with a ARC-1130 and 8 WD-raptor disks.

Best regards,

Arjen

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "jason@ohloh.net"
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA