Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE
Date
Msg-id 7337.1489110864@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> For reasons which must've seemed good to whoever instituted the
>> policy, pg_dump refers to relkinds using the bare letters rather than
>> the constants.

> Even in pg_dump, it appears to me that the large majority of relkind
> references use the symbolic names.

After further study, I think it was psql/describe.c you were remembering.
I cleaned that up...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Teach Catalog.pm how many attributes there should be per DATA() line
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64