Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64
Date
Msg-id 20170310015443.zifn4ysuuqazuycx@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Enabling atomics on ARM64  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017-03-10 10:29:39 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <rvs@apache.org> wrote:
> >> I'd like to offer a forward port from a change I'm contributing
> >> the Greenplum code base over here:
> >>     https://github.com/greenplum-db/gpdb/pull/1983
> 
> +1.
> 
> > Thanks.   Please add this to https://commitfest.postgresql.org/14/ so
> > it doesn't get forgotten.  I'm afraid your patch is probably too late
> > for v10 (the deadline for patches to be considered for v10 was March
> > 1st, though somebody might propose to make an exception), but v11 will
> > be here soon enough.
> 
> Yeah, one month earlier would have been fine though. This is not
> really invasive.

FWIW, Unless somebody seriously protests, I'm going to commit this soon-ish.

- Andres



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre choice of case for RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Teach Catalog.pm how many attributes thereshould be per DATA() line