Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql
Date
Msg-id 7157.1231369978@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql  ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>)
Responses Re: Proposal: new border setting in psql  ("D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
"D'Arcy J.M. Cain" <darcy@druid.net> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> As I remember, no actual patch was posted for this.

> There was.  I am attaching it again in case there were any changes to
> original files in the meantime.

I think what Bruce meant to say is that this patch doesn't produce 100%
spec-compliant ReST, and that almost-ReST doesn't seem like a good
feature.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Adjust things so that the query_string of a cached plan and the
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we still need constraint_exclusion?