Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dimitrios Apostolou
Subject Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward
Date
Msg-id 7115ECB3-2F13-4699-B279-D35C805A5123@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thank you for your work on this, Tom.
I'll try to test it in the weekend.

Dimitris

On 16 October 2025 19:01:10 CEST, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>I wrote:
>> I think this is more or less committable, and then we could get
>> back to the original question of whether it's worth tweaking
>> pg_restore's seek-vs-scan behavior.
>
>And done.  Dimitrios, could you re-do your testing against current
>HEAD, and see if there's still a benefit to tweaking pg_restore's
>seek-vs-read decisions, and if so what's the best number?
>
>            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Buf fix: update-po for PGXS does not work
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Making pg_rewind faster