Request a Demo
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward
Date
Msg-id 1518975.1760634070@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PING] [PATCH v2] parallel pg_restore: avoid disk seeks when jumping short distance forward
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
I wrote:
> I think this is more or less committable, and then we could get
> back to the original question of whether it's worth tweaking
> pg_restore's seek-vs-scan behavior.

And done.  Dimitrios, could you re-do your testing against current
HEAD, and see if there's still a benefit to tweaking pg_restore's
seek-vs-read decisions, and if so what's the best number?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: Error message against iso-8859-1 key in pg_service.conf is unclear
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: POC: enable logical decoding when wal_level = 'replica' without a server restart