On 3/10/17 14:53, Jim Nasby wrote:
> The biggest win we'd get from something like Travis would be if the
> commitfest monitored for new patch files coming in for monitored threads
> and it created a new branch, applied the patches, and if they applied
> without error commit the branch and push to let Travis do it's thing. We
> wouldn't want that running in the main git repo, but it should be fine
> in a fork that's dedicated to that purpose.
This has been discussed several times before, e.g.,
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54DD2413.8030201@gmx.net
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
