Re: bizarre query performance question - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Lennin Caro
Subject Re: bizarre query performance question
Date
Msg-id 706433.11623.qm@web59512.mail.ac4.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to bizarre query performance question  ("H. William Connors II" <bconnors@rochgrp.com>)
Responses Re: bizarre query performance question  ("H. William Connors II" <bconnors@rochgrp.com>)
List pgsql-performance


--- On Wed, 10/1/08, H. William Connors II <bconnors@rochgrp.com> wrote:

> From: H. William Connors II <bconnors@rochgrp.com>
> Subject: [PERFORM] bizarre query performance question
> To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
> Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2008, 8:34 PM
> I have two fairly simple tables as described below.  The
> relationship
> between them is through assignment_id.  The problem is when
> I try to
> join these two tables the planner does a sequential scan on
>
> fa_assignment_detail and the query takes forever to
> resolve.  I've run
> the usual vacuum and analyze commands with no changes.
> I'm not sure how
> long the query actually takes to resolve as its been
> running for over 30
> minutes now (FYI this is on a 8 core IBM Power5 550 with 8
> GB of RAM)
> running RedHat Enterprise 9 and postgresql 8.3.3.  Any
> thoughts?
>
> \d fa_assignment
>                       Table
> "public.fa_assignment"
>      Column      |            Type             |
> Modifiers
> -----------------+-----------------------------+------------------------
>  scenario_id     | integer                     | not null
>  prospect_id     | integer                     | not null
>  assignment_id   | integer                     | not null
>  valid           | boolean                     | not null
> default false
>  modified        | boolean                     | not null
> default true
>  modify_ts       | timestamp without time zone |
>  modify_username | character varying(32)       |
> Indexes:
>     "pk_fa_assignment" PRIMARY KEY, btree
> (scenario_id, prospect_id)
>     "fa_assignment_idx1" btree (assignment_id)
> CLUSTER
>     "fa_assignment_idx2" btree (scenario_id,
> assignment_id)
>     "fa_assignment_idx3" btree (prospect_id)
> Foreign-key constraints:
>     "fk_fa_prospect" FOREIGN KEY (prospect_id)
> REFERENCES
> fa_prospect(prospect_id) DEFERRABLE
>     "fk_fa_scenario" FOREIGN KEY (scenario_id)
> REFERENCES
> fa_scenario(scenario_id) DEFERRABLE
>
>
>
> \d fa_assignment_detail
>                   Table
> "public.fa_assignment_detail"
>      Column      |            Type             |
> Modifiers
> -----------------+-----------------------------+------------------------
>  assignment_id   | integer                     | not null
>  type            | character varying(8)        | not null
>  resource_id     | integer                     |
>  create_ts       | timestamp without time zone | not null
>  create_username | character varying(32)       | not null
>  modify_ts       | timestamp without time zone |
>  modify_username | character varying(32)       |
>  locked          | boolean                     | not null
> default false
>  locked_ts       | timestamp without time zone |
>  locked_username | character varying(32)       |
> Indexes:
>     "pk_fa_assignment_detail" PRIMARY KEY, btree
> (assignment_id, type)
>     "fa_assignment_detail_idx1" btree
> (resource_id)
>     "fa_assignment_detail_idx2" btree
> (assignment_id)
> Foreign-key constraints:
>     "fk_fa_resource1" FOREIGN KEY (resource_id)
> REFERENCES
> fa_resource(resource_id) DEFERRABLE
>
>
>
> fa_assignment has 44184945 records
> fa_assignment_detail has 82196027 records
>
>
>
> explain select * from fa_assignment fa JOIN
> fa_assignment_detail fad ON
> (fad.assignment_id = fa.assignment_id) where fa.scenario_id
> = 0;
>
>                                               QUERY
> PLAN
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Hash Join  (cost=581289.72..4940729.76 rows=9283104
> width=91)
>    Hash Cond: (fad.assignment_id = fa.assignment_id)
>    ->  Seq Scan on fa_assignment_detail fad
> (cost=0.00..1748663.60
> rows=82151360 width=61)
>    ->  Hash  (cost=484697.74..484697.74 rows=4995439
> width=30)
>          ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on fa_assignment fa
> (cost=93483.75..484697.74 rows=4995439 width=30)
>                Recheck Cond: (scenario_id = 0)
>                ->  Bitmap Index Scan on
> fa_assignment_idx2
> (cost=0.00..92234.89 rows=4995439 width=0)
>                      Index Cond: (scenario_id = 0)
> (8 rows)
>
>

The Fk for the table fa_assignment_detail to fa_assignment is nor relationate whit the column assignment_id





pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "H. William Connors II"
Date:
Subject: bizarre query performance question
Next
From: "H. William Connors II"
Date:
Subject: Re: bizarre query performance question