Re: Test::More version - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Test::More version
Date
Msg-id 7055e5a4-c78e-ef4b-69ca-a33cf26c01cd@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Test::More version  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Test::More version
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/15/21 12:43, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> So, discounting prairiedog's intentionally trailing-edge installation,
> the oldest stuff in the buildfarm is 0.98, of which there are five
> instances belonging to four different owners.
>
> Based on this, I'm inclined to think we should select 0.98 as the
> minimum version.  Anything later would inconvenience some people.
> OTOH, it doesn't look like there's any value in promising compatibility
> with 0.96 instead, especially since I see a couple of subplan-related
> bug fixes in 0.97 and 0.98 in Test::Simple's changelog.
>
>     



Yeah, so I think at this stage we're just waiting for you to update
prairiedog and we can make this change.


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Should rename "startup process" to something else?
Next
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: rename SnapBuild* macros in slot.c