Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Procedure calls are not tracked in pg_stat_user_functions /track_functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Procedure calls are not tracked in pg_stat_user_functions /track_functions
Date
Msg-id 6d01afee-2a3b-2871-ef41-d3fcd984b192@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Procedure calls are not tracked in pg_stat_user_functions /track_functions  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Procedure calls are not tracked in pg_stat_user_functions /track_functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 04/10/2018 22:07, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-10-04 12:15:28 -0700, Lukas Fittl wrote:
>> Was this intentional, or an oversight?
>>
>> If welcome, I would be happy to work on a patch. Whilst slightly confusing
>> in terms of naming, we could just track this together with functions, since
>> one can always join with pg_proc to determine whether something is a
>> function or a procedure.
> 
> Yea, that sounds wrong / not ideal to me.  I think we should just fix
> this, should be easy enough.

Here is a patch.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS asOpenSSL alternative