Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Procedure calls are not tracked in pg_stat_user_functions /track_functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Procedure calls are not tracked in pg_stat_user_functions /track_functions
Date
Msg-id 3f2f5cf0-c404-4adc-c1ca-28b1407833f0@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Procedure calls are not tracked in pg_stat_user_functions /track_functions  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 05/10/2018 14:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 04/10/2018 22:07, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2018-10-04 12:15:28 -0700, Lukas Fittl wrote:
>>> Was this intentional, or an oversight?
>>>
>>> If welcome, I would be happy to work on a patch. Whilst slightly confusing
>>> in terms of naming, we could just track this together with functions, since
>>> one can always join with pg_proc to determine whether something is a
>>> function or a procedure.
>>
>> Yea, that sounds wrong / not ideal to me.  I think we should just fix
>> this, should be easy enough.
> 
> Here is a patch.

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Arthur Zakirov
Date:
Subject: Re: Segfault when creating partition with a primary key and sql_droptrigger exists
Next
From: Konstantin Knizhnik
Date:
Subject: Re: out-of-order XID insertion in KnownAssignedXids