Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid
Date
Msg-id 6b03029d-16ab-64d6-f8b5-9a75059fd404@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 2/22/17 19:35, Jim Nasby wrote:
> pg_get_object_address() currently returns a field called subobjid, while 
> pg_depend calls that objsubid. I'm guessing that wasn't on purpose 
> (especially because internally the function uses objsubid), and it'd be 
> nice to fix it.

I'm in favor of changing it, but it could theoretically break someone's
code.  I don't know what the practical use for these functions is.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Soref
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Possible spelling fixes
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning