-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I checked both of those last night when you reported it ... there was one spam
in -bugs and a few from Kris Kennedy in -hackers, but that was it ...
- --On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:26:22 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>> Which lists are slow?
>
>> In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom
>> was referring to, also -hackers.
>
> At the time I was particularly concerned about -hackers and -bugs, but
> I'm not sure which lists have the issue overall. I regularly notice
> batches of two-or-three-day-old messages being released together,
> perhaps several times a week, and hadn't paid any particular attention
> to which lists they were on. I file all the PG lists I read (which is
> most of them) into one folder, so it all kinda blurs together ... but
> I think -bugs is in need of more attention because it's particularly
> likely to get submissions from non-subscribers.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFGHP8n4QvfyHIvDvMRAjrLAKCK+cDhJ+HX31KQAdbLHjSYjtgK4QCfSDYm
VNkW+JlXD2PcnVzocQh8A6A=
=UB1c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
