Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> I checked both of those last night when you reported it ... there was one spam
> in -bugs and a few from Kris Kennedy in -hackers, but that was it ...
I think the problem is that it shouldn't just be checked when somebody
complains, but on a periodical basis.
> - --On Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:26:22 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> wrote:
>
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 08:43:06AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >>> Which lists are slow?
> >
> >> In my case, -patches and -committers. Looking at the thread I *think* Tom
> >> was referring to, also -hackers.
> >
> > At the time I was particularly concerned about -hackers and -bugs, but
> > I'm not sure which lists have the issue overall. I regularly notice
> > batches of two-or-three-day-old messages being released together,
> > perhaps several times a week, and hadn't paid any particular attention
> > to which lists they were on. I file all the PG lists I read (which is
> > most of them) into one folder, so it all kinda blurs together ... but
> > I think -bugs is in need of more attention because it's particularly
> > likely to get submissions from non-subscribers.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
