> There are some immediate questions from our engineers about
performance
>
> "- Oracle has one particular performance enhancement that Postgres is
> missing. If you do a select that returns 100,000 rows in a given
order,
> and all you want are rows 99101 to 99200, then Oracle can do that very
> efficiently. With Postgres, it has to read the first 99200 rows and
> then discard the first 99100. But... If we really want to look at
> performance, then we ought to put together a set of benchmarks of some
> typical tasks."
I agree with Rod: you are correct but this is a very odd objection. You
are declaring a set but are only interested in a tiny subset of that
based on arbitrary critera. You can do this with cursors or with clever
querying (not without materializing the full set however), but why?
Merlin
