> >> The question here
> >> is whether you're ready to break existing custom scripts
> for starting
> >> the postmaster. Maybe there are none such in the wild on Windows,
> >> but I'd be hesitant to assume that.
>
> > We're guessing there aren't - if there are, those are
> scripts calling
> > the SCM which in turns starts postgresql. So we're doing it
> now - if
> > it turns up in beta that people were actually using it from
> elsewhere,
> > we'll jus thave to put it back.
>
> OK. Well, there's certainly no harm in making pg_regress
> execute postgres instead of postmaster, so I'll change that.
Thanks.
//Magnus
