Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?
Date
Msg-id 68922a89-90bd-1906-562d-534d429bef80@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 11/30/18 3:30 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> # And returning to the topic, I vote for pg_config should be "stable".

And on that note, Does this change does warrant backpatching, or should
be applied to master only?

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: New GUC to sample log queries
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY FROM WHEN condition