Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?
Date
Msg-id 20181130151507.GX3415@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_config wrongly marked as not parallel safe?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greetings,

* Joe Conway (mail@joeconway.com) wrote:
> On 11/30/18 3:30 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> > # And returning to the topic, I vote for pg_config should be "stable".
>
> And on that note, Does this change does warrant backpatching, or should
> be applied to master only?

Given that it's a catalog change, I would think just master..

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: Undo worker and transaction rollback
Next
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: Flexible permissions for REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW