Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560
Date
Msg-id 681184.1790694710@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread
In response to Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560  (Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari.slg01@gmail.com> writes:
> I went through v1.  Grouping the SJE candidates by checkAsUser
> looks right to me, including the unset case.  I didn't spot any
> issues.  LGTM.

Pushed, thanks for looking at it!

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: ATTACH PARTITION cost grows linearly with pg_constraint size (seqscan in CloneFkReferenced), much worse since not-null constraints are in pg_constraint (PG 18)
Next
From: Vik Fearing
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Implication