Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More
Date
Msg-id 6715ebfd-770d-c1e9-e9b9-69020ec90383@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Old versions of Test::More  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 04/21/2017 10:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> As we discovered yesterday via jacana, very old versions of Test::More
>> don't support the note() function. It therefore seems prudent to specify
>> a minimum version number for the module in those scripts that use the
>> function. According to the changelog, version 0.82 (released in Oct
>> 2008) should be sufficient. So I suggest the attached patch.
> Maybe it'd be better to put the minimum-version check somewhere central,
> like PostgresNode.pm?  I suppose that our use of "note" will expand,
> and I can't see us remembering to put this into all and only the specific
> tests that use "note".  Especially if there's no comment about it.
>
>             


I'll add a comment, but doing it in PostgresNode.pm would mean jacana
(for instance) couldn't run any of the TAP tests. I'mm looking at
installing a sufficiently modern Test::Simple package (includes
Test::More and test::Build) there, but other oldish machines could also
be affected.


cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Missing feature in Phrase Search?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unportable implementation of background worker start