Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> We run this list in English, note. Is that because it's better than Latin?
> No: it's because more of the participants like it that way. I bet if we had
> a lot of Latin speakers, we'd have made a different decision. And yes,
> there's a certain amount of circularity in such convention-picking (because
> by choosing English, we surely discriminate against the unilingual Latin
> speakers).
De mortuis nil nisi bonum dicendum est.
--
Lew
