Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?
Date
Msg-id 666C6101.8080101@acm.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
Responses Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?
List pgsql-hackers
On 06/14/24 10:39, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Cited that bit in the commit message in the attached patch (also available as a GitHub PR[1]).
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/theory/postgres/pull/5

I would s/extepsions/exceptions/ in the added documentation. :)

Offhand (as GitHub PRs aren't really The PG Way), if they were The Way,
I would find this one a little hard to follow, being based at a point
28 unrelated commits ahead of the ref it's opened against. I suspect
'master' on theory/postgres could be fast-forwarded to f1affb6 and then
the PR would look much more approachable.

Regards,
-Chap



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: CI and test improvements
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Using LibPq in TAP tests via FFI