Re: Gripes about walsender command processing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Gripes about walsender command processing
Date
Msg-id 66005.1600303015@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Gripes about walsender command processing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-Sep-16, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Note that your changes need to be backpatched into v13,
>> because AFAICS this code is violating the FE/BE protocol
>> right now --- it's just luck that libpq isn't moaning
>> about extra CommandComplete messages.  But I don't think
>> we want to change the ps title behavior in v13 at this
>> late date, so that part should be HEAD-only.

> I pushed to 13, but it's because of the removal of the command tag; the
> duplicate tags we've been sending since 9.3.  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Ugh.  Well, fixing v13 is an improvement anyway.  Thanks!

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos