Re: Locking question? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: Locking question?
Date
Msg-id 65937bea0702052243v6926355ap21f51fe5589faf15@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Locking question?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Locking question?
List pgsql-general
On 1/30/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
Shoaib Mir wrote:
> While debugging an application, I just wanted to confirm from the list here:
>
> Suppose I have a long running transaction which has a few updates and
> inserts running on some specific tables which means it has acquired
> Exclusive locks too during the transaction on specific table but if just
> before commit the client app crashes and the commit is never sent, will the
> Exclusive locks be automatically released?

Yes  (assuming the backend dies in the process, which may not happen if
the app dies silently and while not waiting for anything from the
server).


Do you mean that the Ex-lock will be held indefinitely in the following situation"

i) Appln. acquires Exclusive lock.
ii) Appln. sleeps or is interacting with human.
ii) Appln. crashes.

Doesn't the backend kill itself if it detects that the other side of the communincation channel has gone down?


--
gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: When to use compound PK instead of a FK?
Next
From: "Gurjeet Singh"
Date:
Subject: Re: Alter definition of a column