Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Date
Msg-id 647f377d61a41957c9cbff32d3fee8b8.squirrel@webmail.lerctr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0  (Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak@officenet.no>)
Responses Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, January 21, 2010 5:53 pm, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> On Thursday 21. January 2010 10.37.41 Dave Page wrote:
>> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
>> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
>> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
>> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
>>
>> Wait for it....
>>
>> 9.0.
>
> Care to shed some light on what features (yes, we users care about
> features) warrant this major version-bump? Is there a link somewhere?
AFAIR, it was stated if Hot Standby AND Streaming Replication hit the
tree, the release number would go to 9.0.

Both are in the tree.


-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: KaiGai Kohei
Date:
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)