On 7/3/24 18:51, Andrey M. Borodin wrote:
>
>
>> On 3 Jul 2024, at 01:08, Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I'll give it a shot.
>
> Great, thank you! Do you have extended access to CF? Like activity
> log and mass-mail functions? If no I think someone from PG_INFRA can
> grant you necessary access.
>
>
>
>> On 3 Jul 2024, at 20:21, Tomas Vondra
>> <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>> This reminded me that one of the changes proposed at pgconf.dev
>> was having multiple CF managers, each responsible for a subset of
>> the CF entries. Do we want to do try that?
>>
>> IIRC the idea was that it's not really feasible to shepherd ~400
>> patches (the current count for 2024-07), especially if the person
>> has other things to do too, and spreading this over multiple people
>> would make it more manageable - perhaps even allowing more people
>> to participate.
>>
>> If we wanted to try this, would that require some improvements in
>> the CF app, e.g. to track which CF manager is responsible for each
>> entry?
>>
>
> Maybe can we just coordinate here? If Corey does not mind, I'd
> happily help with 2-3 sections. I particularly like "Replication and
> recovery" and "Server features", but would be glad to take any.
>
Sure, why not? If you're both OK with splitting the CFM work, feel free
to decide how to divide the patches. I have imagined would be randomized
in some way, to make it more likely the amount of work is more even
(maybe some of the sections are much larger / more active?), but it's up
to the people doing the work really - no one has the authority to tell
you how to do things ;-)
Maybe there are more people who'd like to help with this - more people
means less daunting amount of work per person ...
Another thing suggested in the "commitfest thread" nearby was that maybe
we should organize a "status update" pass over the entries, where the
more senior developers go over the patches and write some short summary
of what they think needs to happen for each patch to move it forward
I think the conclusion was that it needs to happen early in the cycle,
but that summer won't work because people tend to take vacation etc. So
I guess we shall leave that for the September CF.
But if either of you (as CF managers) thinks some patch is stuck and
would benefit from such feedback, maybe ping me and I'll take a look and
see if I can suggest something.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
