On 2020-03-24 18:57, Tom Lane wrote:
> No doubt that's all fixable, but the realization that some cases of
> this syntax are*not* just syntactic sugar for standards-compliant
> syntax is giving me pause. Do we really want to get out front of
> the SQL committee on extending INSERT in an incompatible way?
What is the additional functionality that we are considering adding here?
The thread started out proposing a more convenient syntax, but it seems
to go deeper now and perhaps not everyone is following.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
