Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Imseih (AWS), Sami
Subject Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem
Date
Msg-id 62176445-FB53-4D0C-8AD1-EF74963AE6D2@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem  ("Imseih (AWS), Sami" <simseih@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: Correct the documentation for work_mem
List pgsql-hackers
Based on the feedback, here is a v1 of the suggested doc changes.

I modified Gurjeets suggestion slightly to make it clear that a specific
query execution could have operations simultaneously using up to 
work_mem.

I also added the small hash table memory limit clarification.


Regards,

Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)






Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
Next
From: Aleksander Alekseev
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extend the length of BackgroundWorker.bgw_library_name