Re: Width of SubTransactionId (hello Postgres PRO) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: Width of SubTransactionId (hello Postgres PRO)
Date
Msg-id 617AC996.3020204@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Width of SubTransactionId (hello Postgres PRO)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Width of SubTransactionId (hello Postgres PRO)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/28/21 10:37, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I know of no plans to implement 64-bit transaction ids in community
> Postgres because of the longer tuple header and file format changes.
> It is discussed occasionally though.

Is there anything you can use a SubTransactionId for outside of C code?

PL/Java interacts with these things through BeginInternalSubTransaction(),
ReleaseCurrentSubTransaction(), or RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction()
in C.

It also has been obeying the letter of the JDBC spec by implementing
a method that can return it to the caller (as a Java 32-bit int, oops,
so decreed by the spec). [0]

But as I think about it, I am not sure there is anything interesting or
useful a Java caller could do with a SubTransactionId anyway. I mean, does
it even appear in a statistics view or SQL-exposed function anywhere? I see
there is a top-level backend_xid in pg_stat_activity, but is there any
exposure of SubTransactionIds anywhere?

Everything you can do with a Savepoint in JDBC (release it or roll it back,
what else is there?) is just a method on the Java object and you don't need
to know its underlying id.

Regards,
-Chap


[0]
https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/12/docs/api/java.sql/java/sql/Savepoint.html#method.detail



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gilles Darold
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATEROLE and role ownership hierarchies