Re: possible bug with compound index. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: possible bug with compound index.
Date
Msg-id 616.1108410517@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: possible bug with compound index.  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: possible bug with compound index.
List pgsql-general
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> What this brings up is that we have no way to create indexes that have
> mixed ascending/descending column specifications.

> Should this be a TODO?  I am unsure.

I thought we already had a TODO to provide reverse-sort operator classes
in the standard distribution.  (In the meantime those that need this can
make up their own; see past discussions in the archives.)

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: possible bug with compound index.
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: possible bug with compound index.