Re: possible bug with compound index. - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: possible bug with compound index.
Date
Msg-id 200502141951.j1EJpZd02916@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: possible bug with compound index.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > What this brings up is that we have no way to create indexes that have
> > mixed ascending/descending column specifications.
>
> > Should this be a TODO?  I am unsure.
>
> I thought we already had a TODO to provide reverse-sort operator classes
> in the standard distribution.  (In the meantime those that need this can
> make up their own; see past discussions in the archives.)

It wasn't there.  Added to TODO:

* Allow the creation of indexes with mixed ascending/descending
  specifiers

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: possible bug with compound index.
Next
From: Ragnar Hafstað
Date:
Subject: Re: DBI and placeholders question