Hi David,
On 07/02/18 18:31, David Steele wrote:
> This proposal is still in need of review and hasn't really gotten it in
> the last few CFs.
Agreed.
> Since the feature does not seem like a good fit for the last CF of PG11
> I am marking it Returned with Feedback.
Is there any chance that it may be still resubmitted / reopened for the
March CF?
Actually right now I am in the process of reviewing it, for it would be
really useful for my "OUZO" project (a fork of the RUM access method).
One general comment I can already make is that enabling compression
should be made optional, which appears to be a small and easy addition
to the generic WAL API.
Best regards,
--
Markus Nullmeier http://www.g-vo.org
German Astrophysical Virtual Observatory (GAVO)
